Sacred Waters: Blue Tech and Anishinaabe Stewardship in Great Lakes Fisheries

Restoring Whitefish Through Innovation and Tradition

The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians is the largest indigenous tribe east of the Mississippi and has been stewarding the fisheries of their Great Lakes territory for generations. As the largest commercial fishing operation among Michigan tribes, their fishermen catch much of the whitefish served in restaurants across the state. But this multi-generational industry faces an existential threat from invasive species—and is responding with a sophisticated blue technology approach that combines traditional ecological knowledge with cutting-edge aquaculture and environmental monitoring systems to ensure a healthy fishery for the next seven generations.

This work serves as a powerful example of the “Grounded Innovation” model discussed in my previous post on regional Blue Tech opportunities. While that framework focused on building educational pathways between BMCC and LSSU, the Sault Tribe Fisheries program demonstrates that world-class blue tech innovation is already happening here—driven not just by economic opportunity, but by cultural necessity and protection of the land.

The Crisis: Invasive Species and Ecosystem Collapse

The Great Lakes ecosystem has been fundamentally restructured by invasive species. Since the 1800s, approximately 188 non-native species have established themselves in these waters, with roughly a third considered harmful to native ecosystems. The zebra and quagga mussels that proliferated in the early 2000s have been particularly devastating.

These invasive mussels function as “ecosystem engineers”—filtering nutrients from the water column that once supported native fish and sequestering them in lake sediments. The result has been catastrophic for whitefish populations. In Northern Lake Michigan, whitefish have been decimated, forcing tribal fishermen to relocate operations to Lake Superior’s Whitefish Point just to stay economically viable.

At Baawitigong (the place of the rapids, now Sault Ste. Marie), oral history tells of whitefish so plentiful “you could walk across the water on them.” The construction of the locks and the subsequent ecological disruption changed everything. Where the St. Mary’s River rapids once provided ideal whitefish habitat, the restructured flow and invasive species have created an entirely different ecosystem.

Blue Tech Response: Integrated Monitoring and Enhancement

The Sault Tribe’s fisheries program exemplifies blue technology in action—applying advanced monitoring systems, data analytics, and innovative aquaculture techniques to address marine resource challenges. The program operates on multiple fronts:

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment: The tribe’s natural resource department employs biologists who continuously monitor fishery stocks through commercial vessel surveys and independent research. This represents a sophisticated data collection infrastructure tracking population dynamics, invasive species distribution, and ecosystem health indicators across the 1836 treaty territory.

Collaborative Early Detection Systems: The program participates in a transnational monitoring network involving US federal agencies, Canadian authorities, and tribal governments. This collaborative framework focuses on early detection of aquatic invasive species—a critical blue tech application where rapid identification can prevent establishment of new invasives. The monitoring infrastructure likely includes water quality sensors, environmental DNA sampling, and networked data sharing systems.

Experimental Aquaculture Innovation: Perhaps most significantly, the tribe launched an experimental whitefish hatchery program five years ago—a blue tech innovation addressing a species never before successfully raised in North American pond systems. The program involves:

• Wild broodstock collection and egg stripping
• Controlled incubation systems (5-month cycle)
• Pond-based grow-out operations producing fish adapted to natural foraging
• Transportation and stocking logistics across treaty waters

This represents applied aquaculture technology development, generating novel protocols for a commercially and culturally critical species. The goal is restoring self-sustaining wild populations rather than supplementing harvest with hatchery production.

The Blue Economy Dimension

The Sault Tribe fisheries program illuminates several key blue economy principles:

Sustainable Use of Marine Resources: The program balances commercial harvest with restoration, embodying the tribal principle of “take what you need and leave the rest.” This traditional management approach aligns perfectly with sustainable blue economy frameworks emphasizing long-term resource stewardship over short-term extraction.

Technology-Enabled Traditional Practices: Blue tech doesn’t replace traditional ecological knowledge—it amplifies it. The monitoring systems and aquaculture programs build on generations of accumulated understanding about whitefish behavior, habitat requirements, and population dynamics.

Economic Resilience Through Innovation: When invasive species collapsed traditional fishing grounds, the tribe didn’t abandon the fishery—they innovated. Relocating operations, developing new hatchery capabilities, and participating in research networks demonstrate adaptive capacity essential for blue economy success.

Food Security and Community Wellbeing: The program provides an estimated 1 million meals annually to tribal citizens from the 1836 treaty territory. This represents blue tech serving not just commercial interests but fundamental community food sovereignty.

Treaty Rights and Environmental Stewardship

The 1836 Treaty of Washington ceded 14 million acres to the federal government, enabling Michigan statehood while guaranteeing tribal rights to hunt, fish, and gather on those lands. As the tribe emphasizes, these are not privileges but constitutionally protected rights “bought and paid for with the blood of our ancestors.”

The fisheries program represents the practical application of these treaty rights—and demonstrates that indigenous resource management often leads environmental stewardship rather than following it. The tribe was monitoring invasive species, developing restoration programs, and implementing sustainable harvest practices while exercising rights that mainstream society often questioned.

Seven Generations: Long-Term Blue Tech Thinking

The tribal principle of seven generations—making decisions considering impacts seven generations into the future—aligns fundamentally with effective blue technology development. Hatchery program managers acknowledge they may never see the full results of their work, comparing it to 30-40 year restoration projects for other Great Lakes species.

This long-term perspective contrasts sharply with quarterly earnings thinking that often dominates technology development and natural resource exploitation. Blue tech applications in fisheries restoration require:

• Multi-decade research and development timelines
• Continuous monitoring and adaptive management
• Investment in uncertain outcomes for future generations
• Collaboration across jurisdictional and cultural boundaries

Implications for Blue Tech Development

The Sault Tribe fisheries program offers several lessons for broader blue technology applications:

1. Indigenous Knowledge Integration: Effective blue tech builds on rather than replaces traditional ecological knowledge. The tribe’s understanding of whitefish life history, habitat requirements, and ecosystem relationships informed their innovative hatchery protocols.

2. Community-Centered Technology: Blue tech succeeds when it serves community wellbeing and food security, not just commercial profit. The program’s success metrics include meals provided to citizens and cultural practice preservation alongside commercial catch values.

3. Adaptive Innovation: When established practices (fishing Northern Lake Michigan) became untenable, the program adapted (relocating to Lake Superior, developing whitefish aquaculture). Blue tech applications must embed this adaptive capacity.

4. Transboundary Collaboration: Invasive species and ecosystem restoration don’t respect political boundaries. The tri-national monitoring network demonstrates how blue tech infrastructure must operate at ecosystem scales.

5. Long-Term Investment Horizons: Restoring whitefish populations requires decades of sustained effort without guaranteed outcomes. Blue tech funding and policy frameworks must accommodate this reality rather than demanding short-term returns.

Looking Forward

As the Great Lakes face ongoing challenges from invasive species, climate change, and competing uses, the Sault Tribe’s integration of blue technology with traditional stewardship offers a model for sustainable freshwater fisheries management. The program demonstrates that blue tech isn’t just about ocean applications—inland freshwater systems require equally sophisticated technological approaches.

The next seven generations of tribal fishermen may well harvest whitefish whose parents or grandparents were hatched in the tribe’s ponds—a direct result of blue technology innovation rooted in cultural continuity and environmental responsibility. This is blue tech at its most effective: serving communities, restoring ecosystems, and honoring both ancestors and descendants.

---

This post synthesizes information from the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians fisheries program documentation and relates their work to broader blue technology and blue economy frameworks.