Navigating SMART Building Certifications: From SPIRE to LEED to WELL
In today’s SMART building landscape, technology integration and energy efficiency are central to modern design. Whether you’re renovating a commercial property or managing an existing structure, aligning with recognized certifications can enhance sustainability, operational performance, and long-term value.
SPIRE Smart Building Certification
One certification gaining traction is the SPIRE Smart Building Certification1, developed by UL and TIA. SPIRE provides a holistic framework that evaluates six key dimensions:
SPIRE’s Six Key Performance Dimensions
⚡ Power & Energy
Energy efficiency, optimization, and renewable integration❤️ Health & Well-being
Indoor air quality, occupant comfort, and wellness🛡️ Life & Property Safety
Fire and life safety systems, emergency response capabilities🔗 Connectivity
Network infrastructure, system integration, and interoperability🔒 Cybersecurity
Data protection, privacy, network security, and resilience🌱 Sustainability
Environmental impact and resource conservation
SPIRE helps building owners and managers benchmark performance through a self-assessment tool and optional third-party verification. This approach makes it accessible without requiring specialized credentials.
The Convergence of OT, IT, IoT, and Energy
Understanding SMART buildings requires recognizing how four critical domains converge:
-
Operational Technology (OT): Physical systems that monitor and control building infrastructure—HVAC, lighting, elevators, fire safety, and access control. Historically isolated and proprietary.
-
Information Technology (IT): Digital networks, servers, and data systems that enable communication, computation, and business operations. Traditionally focused on enterprise computing.
-
Internet of Things (IoT): Sensors, actuators, and connected devices that bridge the physical and digital worlds—gathering real-time data and enabling automated responses.
-
Energy Systems: Power generation, distribution, and consumption—including renewable sources, battery storage, EV charging, and demand response.
The SMART Building Revolution: These domains are no longer separate. Modern buildings integrate OT, IT, and IoT on shared networks powered by intelligent energy systems2. A single PoE network can deliver both data (IT) and power (energy) to sensors (IoT) that optimize HVAC performance (OT). This convergence creates unprecedented efficiency but also introduces complexity—requiring unified security, interoperability standards, and coordinated governance.
SPIRE’s framework addresses this convergence by evaluating connectivity, cybersecurity, and energy holistically. However, implementation requires technical expertise that spans all four domains.
While SPIRE does not embed National Electrical Code (NEC) requirements, it encourages compliance with recognized standards. This is especially relevant as the 2026 NEC introduces major updates for limited-energy systems—such as PoE lighting, Class 2/3 circuits, and fault-managed power—by consolidating rules under Chapter 73. These changes simplify design and compliance for SMART buildings, aligning electrical safety with evolving low-energy technologies.
Other Leading Certifications
SPIRE is part of a broader ecosystem of certifications, each emphasizing different priorities:
- WELL4: Focuses on human health and well-being, with criteria like air, water, nourishment, light, and community impact.
- Living Building Challenge5: A rigorous sustainability standard across seven performance areas, including energy, water, and materials.
- Fitwel6: Prioritizes occupant health through design strategies that promote physical activity and healthy food access.
- SmartScore7: Specializes in evaluating SMART building technology, connectivity, and user experience.
- LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design)8: A widely adopted green building certification emphasizing energy efficiency, water conservation, and sustainable materials.
SPIRE provides a useful, holistic framework for evaluating SMART buildings. To translate certification goals into resilient, code-compliant, and future-ready buildings, leadership should adopt an integrated technical and programmatic approach. This means mapping OKRs to certification criteria, coordinating design and engineering teams, and leveraging synergies between standards like SPIRE and LEED to maximize impact while maintaining compliance with codes such as NEC 2026.
Strategic Approach to Certification
Organizations often pursue multiple certifications to meet diverse goals. To maximize impact:
-
Define Priorities
Identify what matters most—energy efficiency, occupant well-being, resilience, or SMART-tech integration. -
Align Budget and Schedule
Ensure resources and timelines support certification requirements. -
Map Strategies to Standards
Require design teams to document how proposed solutions meet each selected certification. -
Leverage Synergies
Pursuing multiple certifications concurrently helps uncover overlaps and trade-offs early, enabling informed design decisions that align measurable outcomes with long-term performance goals.
Leadership Strategy for Certification Alignment
Building certifications such as SPIRE do not directly reference NEC 2026 or other codes - they focus on performance frameworks rather than prescriptive compliance. This creates an opportunity for organizational leadership to align certification strategies with Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) while ensuring technical compliance and resilience.
To translate certification goals into code-compliant, future-ready buildings, leadership should adopt an integrated technical and programmatic approach that includes:
Actionable Steps for Leadership
-
Map OKRs to Certification Criteria
Define measurable objectives (e.g., energy efficiency, occupant well-being, cybersecurity resilience) and align them with frameworks like SPIRE and LEED. -
Develop a Multi-Certification Strategy
Combine complementary certifications (e.g., SPIRE + LEED + WELL) to cover technology, sustainability, and health. -
Integrate Code Compliance into Design Governance
Embed NEC 2026 updates for low-energy systems into electrical, Operational Technology (OT) and Information Technology (IT) design standards. -
Establish Cross-Functional Governance
Form a steering committee with representatives from facilities, IT, sustainability, and finance to monitor progress and resolve conflicts. -
Leverage Data and Digital Tools
Use building performance dashboards to track certification metrics and compliance indicators. -
Communicate and Cascade Objectives
Share certification goals across all stakeholders and incorporate them into contracts and design briefs. -
Plan for Future Readiness
Adopt scalable technologies like Passive Optical LAN and DC microgrids to reduce conversion losses and support NEC 2026 standards.
Leadership Impact:
By taking these steps, leadership ensures certifications are integrated into a strategic roadmap that delivers measurable outcomes—energy savings, occupant health, and resilience—while maintaining compliance and positioning the organization for long-term success.
Technical Deep Dive: NEC 2026 Changes for Low-Energy Systems
The 2026 National Electrical Code (NEC)9 introduces significant updates that impact SMART building design:
-
Consolidation of Limited-Energy Systems
Articles governing low-voltage and power-limited circuits (previously scattered across Chapters 7 and 8) are now unified under Chapter 7, eliminating Chapter 8’s independence. -
PoE and Class 2/3 Circuits
Clearer rules for Power over Ethernet (PoE) and Class 2/3 circuits, addressing conductor sizing, heat rise, and cable bundling for safety. -
Fault-Managed Power Systems (Class 4)
Expanded provisions for Class 4 circuits, which deliver higher power safely using fault-managed technology—critical for advanced SMART building applications. -
Improved Coordination for Communication and Power
Harmonized requirements for communication cables and power-limited circuits, reducing ambiguity for integrated systems.
Why It Matters:
These changes simplify compliance and support the growing adoption of PoE lighting, intelligent sensors, and distributed power systems in SMART buildings—key elements for achieving certifications like SPIRE and LEED.
Technical Deep Dive: Passive Optical LAN (POL) in Smart Buildings
Passive Optical LAN (POL) is a fiber-based networking architecture that replaces traditional copper LANs with a simplified, energy-efficient design. It leverages Passive Optical Network (PON) technology—commonly used in carrier-grade deployments—and adapts it for enterprise environments, including SMART buildings.
Key Technical Features
-
Architecture:
POL uses single-mode fiber and passive optical splitters to distribute connectivity from a central Optical Line Terminal (OLT) to multiple Optical Network Terminals (ONTs). Unlike copper-based LANs, there are no active electronics between OLT and ONTs, reducing power and cooling needs. -
Bandwidth & Scalability:
Supports GPON and XGS-PON standards, enabling speeds from 1 Gbps to 10 Gbps per ONT, with future-ready migration paths to 40G and 100G without major infrastructure changes. -
Reach:
Fiber allows up to 20 km coverage from a single OLT, eliminating the need for multiple telecom rooms and reducing building complexity. -
Power Delivery:
ONTs often include PoE+ ports to power devices like Wi-Fi access points, IP cameras, and IoT sensors, supporting converged building systems.
Benefits for Smart Building Certifications
-
Energy Efficiency:
POL reduces energy consumption by up to 60% compared to copper LANs, lowering HVAC loads and operational costs. -
Space & Material Savings:
Eliminates most telecom closets, reduces cabling diameter and weight, and minimizes use of copper and plastics—aligning with LEED and Living Building Challenge sustainability goals. -
Lifecycle & Sustainability:
Fiber infrastructure lasts decades, reducing landfill waste and supporting green building certifications. -
Security & Reliability:
Fiber is inherently harder to tap, and POL systems offer carrier-grade reliability (up to 99.999% uptime) with advanced redundancy options.
Technical Deep Dive: AC/DC Conversion Losses and DC Distribution
Modern SMART buildings rely heavily on DC-powered devices—LED lighting, IT equipment, IoT sensors, and renewable energy systems. However, most buildings still distribute AC power, requiring multiple conversions:
-
Conversion Losses:
Each AC-to-DC conversion wastes 5–20% of energy as heat, even with efficient switching converters. -
Compounded Losses:
Solar panels and batteries produce DC, which is often converted to AC for distribution, then back to DC for loads—doubling conversion losses.
Efficiency Gains from DC Distribution
-
Direct DC Microgrids:
Reduce conversion steps, saving 10–20% energy in typical commercial buildings and up to 30% in renewable-heavy systems. -
Lower Cooling Demand:
Fewer conversions mean less heat, reducing HVAC loads in telecom rooms and data centers. -
Supports Smart Tech:
DC aligns with PoE lighting, EV chargers, and IoT systems, simplifying infrastructure and improving reliability.
Why It Matters:
Reducing AC/DC conversions improves energy efficiency, supports net-zero goals, and complements certifications like LEED and SPIRE by lowering operational energy use.
Key Takeaways
SPIRE offers a comprehensive SMART building framework but does not formally reference NEC 2026. However, understanding NEC’s new low-energy system provisions, leveraging Passive Optical LAN, and reducing AC/DC conversion losses are critical for future-ready designs. Combining SPIRE with other certifications like WELL and LEED creates a balanced approach to technology, sustainability, and occupant health. To translate certification goals into resilient, code-compliant, and future-ready buildings, adopt an integrated technical and programmatic approach:
- Reconcile standards and codes: treat SPIRE as the performance framework while explicitly mapping NEC 2026 low-energy provisions (Chapter 7) into design documents—especially PoE, Class 2/3, and Class 4 (fault-managed) systems.
- Prioritize early electrical & telecom engagement: involve electrical engineers and network architects at schematic design to validate conductor sizing, cable bundling, heat-rise, and POL architecture against NEC and manufacturer limits.
- Specify Passive Optical LAN where appropriate: document POL benefits (reduced energy, fewer telecom rooms, higher reach, security) in the sustainability narrative and include installation, testing, and redundancy requirements in contract drawings and O&M manuals.
- Design for DC-friendly distribution: evaluate DC microgrids or local DC distribution in energy models to quantify potential 10–30% energy savings, reduced cooling load, and alignment with PoE lighting and battery/solar systems.
- Model lifecycle and operational impacts: run energy, thermal, and lifecycle cost analyses that include conversion losses, PoE loads, and POL power profiles to support certification credits and business-case decisions.
- Coordinate certifications and credits: map WELL/LEED/Living Building/Fitwel points to SPIRE criteria to identify synergies and avoid duplicated scope; target overlapping measures (energy, health, materials) for concurrent crediting.
- Create verification and performance targets: establish Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) for measurable outcomes (energy intensity, PoE penetration, POL uptime, conversion-loss reduction, occupant WELL metrics), require third-party verification where useful, and define post-occupancy monitoring.
- Update procurement and training: include NEC-2026-aware specifications in RFPs, require vendor compliance statements for PoE/Class 4 equipment, and plan installer/operator training on low-energy and POL systems.
- Plan for phased deployment and resilience: adopt staged upgrades (telecom consolidation, pilot PoE lighting, DC zones) to de-risk implementation while preserving pathways to full certification and code compliance.
- Document risk and governance: record assumptions, tradeoffs, and maintenance plans so building owners can sustain certification outcomes, meet NEC obligations, and adapt to evolving SMART-building technology.
This combined technical, contractual, and operational strategy ensures SPIRE’s holistic goals are met while proactively addressing NEC 2026, POL opportunities, and AC/DC efficiency gains—maximizing sustainability, occupant health, and long-term value.
Additional Resources
-
UL and TIA. “SPIRE Smart Building Certification.” A holistic framework evaluating power, energy, health, safety, connectivity, cybersecurity, and sustainability in smart buildings. Developed by Underwriters Laboratories (UL) and the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA). Learn more at: https://smartbuildingsinstitute.org/spire/ ↩
-
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2023). “Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems.” Discusses the convergence of OT, IT, and IoT in built environments. Learn more at: https://www.nist.gov/el/cyber-physical-systems ↩
-
UL Solutions. “SPIRE Smart Building Program Overview.” Comprehensive assessment and rating program for smart buildings, providing tools for self-assessment and third-party verification across six key performance dimensions. Learn more at: https://www.ul.com/services/first-comprehensive-smart-building-assessment-and-rating-program ↩
-
International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). “WELL Building Standard.” A performance-based certification focusing on human health and well-being through ten core concepts including air, water, nourishment, light, movement, thermal comfort, sound, materials, mind, and community. Learn more at: https://www.wellcertified.com/ ↩
-
International Living Future Institute. “Living Building Challenge.” One of the most rigorous sustainability certifications, requiring net-positive energy, water, and waste performance across seven performance areas (place, water, energy, health & happiness, materials, equity, and beauty). Learn more at: https://living-future.org/lbc/ ↩
-
Center for Active Design. “Fitwel Certification.” A building certification system optimized for healthier workplaces and residential buildings, focusing on evidence-based design strategies that promote occupant health, including physical activity, nutrition access, and safety. Learn more at: https://www.fitwel.org/ ↩
-
WiredScore (formerly Institute for Market Transformation). “SmartScore.” A commercial real estate certification that rates buildings on their technological capability, connectivity infrastructure, and user functionality—evaluating technology’s contribution to enhanced occupant experience and operational efficiency. Learn more at: https://www.smartscore.com/ ↩
-
U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). “LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design).” The world’s most widely used green building rating system, providing a framework for healthy, efficient, carbon-saving, and cost-effective green buildings across categories including sustainable sites, water efficiency, energy, materials, and indoor environmental quality. Learn more at: https://www.usgbc.org/leed/ ↩
-
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). “National Electrical Code (NEC).” The benchmark for safe electrical design, installation, and inspection to protect people and property from electrical hazards. The 2026 edition introduces significant updates for low-energy and power-limited systems under Chapter 7. Learn more at: https://www.nfpa.org/nec ↩